17. Indian Judiciary152 questions
← Chapters

17. Indian Judiciary

152 questions
0 of 152 answered
Mock Test Starting…
00:00
Question 1 of 1
1. In how many judges was the strength of the Supreme Court originally fixed at its inception?
2. As per Article 124(1) of the Constitution, the Supreme Court was to consist of the Chief Justice and not more than how many other judges, until Parliament prescribed a larger number?
3. In which year was the strength of Supreme Court judges (other than the Chief Justice) increased to thirty-three?
4. The strength of Supreme Court judges (other than the Chief Justice) was increased to twenty-five in which year?
5. On which date was the Supreme Court of India inaugurated?
6. The Supreme Court of India succeeded which body that was established under the Government of India Act of 1935?
7. The Supreme Court replaced which body as the highest court of appeal?
8. Articles 124 to 147, dealing with the organisation, independence, and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, are placed in which Part of the Constitution?
9. Consider the following statements regarding the appointment of Supreme Court judges: (I) The Chief Justice is appointed by the President after consultation with such judges of the Supreme Court and high courts as deemed necessary. (II) Other judges are appointed by the President after consultation with the Chief Justice and such other judges as deemed necessary. (III) Consultation with the Chief Justice is obligatory only for the appointment of the Chief Justice. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
10. In the First Judges case, the Supreme Court held that "consultation" with the Chief Justice in judicial appointments means what?
11. In which year was the First Judges case decided?
12. Which case reversed the earlier ruling and held that the advice of the Chief Justice of India on judicial appointments is binding on the President?
13. In the Second Judges case, the Chief Justice was required to tender advice after consulting how many of his/her seniormost colleagues?
14. In the Third Judges case, the Supreme Court held that the Chief Justice must consult a collegium of how many seniormost judges?
15. In which year was the Third Judges case decided?
16. The 99th Constitutional Amendment Act and the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, both enacted to replace the collegium system, were passed in which year?
17. In the Fourth Judges case (2015), the Supreme Court declared which body unconstitutional and void?
18. Who was appointed as Chief Justice of India in 1973 by superseding three senior judges?
19. In 1977, who was appointed Chief Justice of India by superseding the then senior-most judge?
20. Consider the following statements regarding the appointment of the Chief Justice of India: (I) From 1950 to 1973, the practice was to appoint the seniormost judge of the Supreme Court as Chief Justice. (II) The government's discretion to depart from seniority was curtailed by the Second Judges case (1993). (III) The Second Judges case ruled that only the seniormost judge of the Supreme Court should be appointed Chief Justice. Which of the above statements is/are correct?